A few years ago, I walked into a standing meeting at a school. It was scheduled for 3:30 p.m. At 3:32, two people were there. At 3:35, a few more drifted in. The principal arrived breathless at 3:41, and we officially began at 3:44. No one was surprised or annoyed. Everyone simply adapted.
I remember feeling unsettled — not because of the lateness, but because of the quiet resignation in the room. These were smart, committed educators. Their strategic plan was full of bold aspirations about collaboration and alignment. But the human system — what people actually practiced — told a different story. That moment revealed a larger truth: Culture isn’t built by what’s written. It’s built by what’s repeated.
Most schools think the hardest part of change is defining the strategy. In my experience, the hardest part is redesigning the invisible human systems — the habits, rituals, and unwritten rules — that shape how people behave when no one is officially leading. These patterns never appear on the org chart, but they determine everything about whether change sticks or quietly evaporates.
The Work Beneath the Work
Traditional change efforts focus on leadership alignment, communication plans, and professional development. These matter, but they only capture part of the story. The other half lives in the felt experience of a school — in how meetings begin, who speaks first, how conflict is handled, how decisions are actually made, what gets celebrated, and how safe people feel to try something new.
These micro-moments either strengthen the culture a school hopes to build or quietly undermine it. Yet schools rarely examine these forces with the same attention they give their strategic plans.
The Message of 3:44
That meeting that began at 3:44 had become a pattern. When a meeting starts late every single week, the system is quietly communicating that shared time isn’t protected, alignment isn’t urgent, and norms are flexible. I remember wondering what else might be slipping out of alignment in such small, unnoticed ways.
We didn’t fix this by revisiting the strategic plan. We fixed it by redesigning one habit. For a month, every meeting began with a 90-second prompt at the exact scheduled time — no waiting, no soft starts. Within two weeks, the room was full at 3:29. The energy shifted. People were more present. The space felt intentional. I felt it, too — the sense that something small but meaningful had clicked into place.
The Leadership Team That Nods in Unison
Another moment came from a leadership team finalizing their course enrollment process. Each year, the division leader copied the same Google Doc, changed the dates, and sent it out again. On paper, the plan looked clear. But every spring, the process still felt disjointed.
In a meeting intended to confirm alignment, the team nodded along. But afterward, in one-on-one conversations, the truth emerged: The system didn’t actually work. Students were choosing classes before teachers had revised or proposed updates. Department chairs were left reconciling decisions made out of order. Everyone knew the system was broken, but no one wanted to be the person to say it.
I felt the familiar tension of a room performing alignment rather than practicing it.
Then someone finally voiced what everyone else had been carrying: “Can we talk about why students are choosing courses before we finish revising the courses themselves?” The room paused. Then shoulders eased. Others agreed. Years of unspoken frustration suddenly surfaced. With one act of honesty, the room shifted from politeness to possibility.
To support that shift, we added a simple ritual to the end of every meeting: Each person shared what now felt clear, what still felt unclear, and what they needed to feel committed. Within weeks, leaders were speaking more candidly, and “hallway conversations after the meeting” disappeared. Alignment moved from performance to practice.
The Team That Confused Friendship for Alignment
I also worked with a leadership team that genuinely liked one another. They knew about each other’s children, weekend plans, and aging parents. Their closeness made them feel like a cohesive team.
But as we clarified their strategic direction, a different picture emerged. They didn’t share a common language for the future they wanted. They interpreted priorities differently. And because they valued their friendships, they avoided challenging one another. Disagreement felt like disloyalty.
I remember the tenderness of that realization — the discomfort of seeing that warmth and alignment are not the same.
We slowed down and defined terms together. We practiced ways to surface disagreement without jeopardizing relationships. Over time, their warmth deepened because it finally included truth.
A Different Kind of Leadership
Moments like these — late-starting meetings, quiet nodding, friendships that masked misalignment — showed me that culture doesn’t shift through declarations. It shifts through tiny interactions that shape how adults learn and work together. When culture is built from these small interactions, leadership becomes less about managing initiatives and more about creating the micro-conditions that allow adults to grow collectively.
I’ve come to see my work differently because of this. I now pay attention to the energy in the room before a meeting starts, to what people do with their hands when someone disagrees, to hesitations in the pauses. These small cues reveal more about a school’s readiness for change than any document ever could. The guiding question becomes not “How do we roll out this plan?” but “What tiny practices will help us live it?”
Strategic change doesn’t happen in broad strokes. It happens in the patterns inside the patterns. I often ask leaders, “What does Wednesday at 2:15 feel like in your school?” Because that feeling — quiet, unpolished, honest — is what reveals whether a plan is alive or laminated. And when I see a school begin to shift in these micro-moments, I feel it in myself, too — a rising sense of possibility, subtle but unmistakable.
Change doesn’t stick because we planned it. Change sticks because we practiced it — one human moment, one brave question, one micro-habit at a time.


